the day social Media said enough

First it was Twitter, then Facebook and Instagram, and Pinterest got on board. I’m talking about banning the President in light of the events on January 6 in the nation’s capital. Next, Apple and Google announced that the Parler app wouldn’t be available on their respective platforms.  Finally, and I mean finally, Amazon got on board with the idea of using their powers for good and suspended Parler’s website, in an effort to stop the drastic spread of communication among fringe groups.

In the coming days, there’ll be continued conversations about whether it’s legal for Twitter to ban Trump (it is) and whether or not it’s censorship (it’s not).  But in a media context, this is the most recent example of how social media isn’t going anywhere. It’s not only this thing that kids make money from in Tik Tok houses creating what they call content. It’s more than brands giving consumers the ability to click to buy products from Instagram changing the shopping experience. The difference is that social media platforms are private.

I’d go so far as to argue that this is a printing press moment – the spread and availability of information at a pace never seen before.

To those who think that this is an attack on the freedom of speech, let me remind you what media law classes teach as well as what’s on the Cornell Law school website :

The Supreme Court has cited three “reasons why threats of violence are outside the First Amendment”: “protecting individuals from the fear of violence, from the disruption that fear engenders, and from the possibility that the threatened violence will occur.”

Call me crazy but President’s Trumps words were a call to action that violated all 3 of those reasons. Take that further – the Freedom Forum Institute out of Washington DC puts it in simpler terms: 

 “Although different scholars view unprotected speech in different ways, there are basically nine categories:

Obscenity
Fighting words
Defamation (including libel and slander)
Child pornography
Perjury
Blackmail
Incitement to imminent lawless action
True threats
Solicitations to commit crimes

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s